<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Autohiding widgets: a prototype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/autohiding-widgets-a-prototype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/autohiding-widgets-a-prototype/</link>
	<description>Cries of help from yet another KDE coder (metellius@freenode)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:04:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan (Borker)</title>
		<link>http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/autohiding-widgets-a-prototype/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan (Borker)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-255</guid>
		<description>This looks like a job for some nice animations... It is already somewhat obvious that your available controls are being effected by the resize as they are disappearing at a disproportionate rate to the other areas of the screen. At the point at which they disappear completely or iconify or what have you, a neat indication of them zooming into icon mode or &#039;popping&#039; as they disappear should assist in notifying the user what has happened</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a job for some nice animations&#8230; It is already somewhat obvious that your available controls are being effected by the resize as they are disappearing at a disproportionate rate to the other areas of the screen. At the point at which they disappear completely or iconify or what have you, a neat indication of them zooming into icon mode or &#8216;popping&#8217; as they disappear should assist in notifying the user what has happened</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litb</title>
		<link>http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/autohiding-widgets-a-prototype/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>litb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-254</guid>
		<description>ok, i think it is alright as it is. hose toolbars will only be hidden when the window becomes extremely small. i think no caption is needed to say &quot;oh here was a tool. maybe at the very top, there could then be a small bar saying 
&quot;Click here, or enlarge the window to show more tools&quot; . And if you click, then the window is resized automatically, so that everything is shown with the minimal window size. 

How about that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, i think it is alright as it is. hose toolbars will only be hidden when the window becomes extremely small. i think no caption is needed to say &#8220;oh here was a tool. maybe at the very top, there could then be a small bar saying<br />
&#8220;Click here, or enlarge the window to show more tools&#8221; . And if you click, then the window is resized automatically, so that everything is shown with the minimal window size. </p>
<p>How about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prototipo per il ridimensionamento dinamico delle finestre « pollycoke :)</title>
		<link>http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/autohiding-widgets-a-prototype/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Prototipo per il ridimensionamento dinamico delle finestre « pollycoke :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-253</guid>
		<description>[...] delle finestre&#8220;, ricordate? Adesso a distanza di un pochissimo sembra essere ufficialmente avviato il progetto che potrebbe portare questa piccola grande miglioria sui nostri [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] delle finestre&#8220;, ricordate? Adesso a distanza di un pochissimo sembra essere ufficialmente avviato il progetto che potrebbe portare questa piccola grande miglioria sui nostri [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/autohiding-widgets-a-prototype/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-251</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone! Maybe I&#039;m bit out of context here but how important discoverability really is? Take gimp as an example: all the toolboxes can be switched from a menu and are off by default. In koffice they are on by default (which IMHO is a mistake s it totally clutters the working environment and distracts the user from the real work) but still are switchable from the menus. I think it is more important to have a piece of software that will let me work by default, no matter the size of my screen, than one I have to hide all the docks only to see the work space. Anyway, this is great work and I think it should be discussed with both the users and the usability experts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone! Maybe I&#8217;m bit out of context here but how important discoverability really is? Take gimp as an example: all the toolboxes can be switched from a menu and are off by default. In koffice they are on by default (which IMHO is a mistake s it totally clutters the working environment and distracts the user from the real work) but still are switchable from the menus. I think it is more important to have a piece of software that will let me work by default, no matter the size of my screen, than one I have to hide all the docks only to see the work space. Anyway, this is great work and I think it should be discussed with both the users and the usability experts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ris</title>
		<link>http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/autohiding-widgets-a-prototype/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>ris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-250</guid>
		<description>&quot;How about, instead of completely hiding the panels, just minimize them so that only their title is showing?&quot;

Or maybe, if it&#039;s a stack of docks, compress them into a qtoolbox-style stack of rollups. (I say qtoolbox-style because qtoolbox is horibly wasteful of space.)

This would let the user override the chosen dockwidget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How about, instead of completely hiding the panels, just minimize them so that only their title is showing?&#8221;</p>
<p>Or maybe, if it&#8217;s a stack of docks, compress them into a qtoolbox-style stack of rollups. (I say qtoolbox-style because qtoolbox is horibly wasteful of space.)</p>
<p>This would let the user override the chosen dockwidget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel</title>
		<link>http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/autohiding-widgets-a-prototype/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-249</guid>
		<description>We will have to see a real user case...
But this remind me the auto hide menu options in my colleges&#039; Microsoft Office.
Wich for me is kind of annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will have to see a real user case&#8230;<br />
But this remind me the auto hide menu options in my colleges&#8217; Microsoft Office.<br />
Wich for me is kind of annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/autohiding-widgets-a-prototype/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-248</guid>
		<description>Harald, don&#039;t misunderstand me - I think it&#039;s fantastic that you are trying to tackle this issue, and I only wish to point out some of the issues that autohiding brings!

great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harald, don&#8217;t misunderstand me &#8211; I think it&#8217;s fantastic that you are trying to tackle this issue, and I only wish to point out some of the issues that autohiding brings!</p>
<p>great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanaKil</title>
		<link>http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/autohiding-widgets-a-prototype/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>DanaKil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-247</guid>
		<description>&quot;it could just be tested in a smaller application first to see how it works?&quot;

maybe KTorrent ? It has at least 2 retractable dock that could collapse when the size of the windows become too small.

About the discoverability issue, maybe a passive popup could help... (it would be cool if this auto-hide feature could be enabled or disabled (and the popup too) somewhere in System Settings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it could just be tested in a smaller application first to see how it works?&#8221;</p>
<p>maybe KTorrent ? It has at least 2 retractable dock that could collapse when the size of the windows become too small.</p>
<p>About the discoverability issue, maybe a passive popup could help&#8230; (it would be cool if this auto-hide feature could be enabled or disabled (and the popup too) somewhere in System Settings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenPeace</title>
		<link>http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/autohiding-widgets-a-prototype/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenPeace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-246</guid>
		<description>I already say that this is good and may be is best of the year interface improvement!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already say that this is good and may be is best of the year interface improvement!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uga</title>
		<link>http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/autohiding-widgets-a-prototype/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>uga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metelliuscode.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-245</guid>
		<description>I can imagine a Joe user having two applications side by side to dnd, compare or copy between them, so that this KDE app is reduced in size. But the guy may still _need_ those tools that are hidden. Why not let the guy pick which of them he wants to remove? The application, unfortunately, cannot tell if those &quot;less used&quot; tools are needed

just my 2eur cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can imagine a Joe user having two applications side by side to dnd, compare or copy between them, so that this KDE app is reduced in size. But the guy may still _need_ those tools that are hidden. Why not let the guy pick which of them he wants to remove? The application, unfortunately, cannot tell if those &#8220;less used&#8221; tools are needed</p>
<p>just my 2eur cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
